From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 12 03:00:54 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D94DBC;
 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:00:54 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com
 [209.85.160.54])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3328FC1E;
 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:00:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id rp8so2692226pbb.13
 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
 :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=py3aiOnv1FTgNAAdaNYMAWSOxUyjQXWYbux+ga7OKVc=;
 b=eSbxZNJe1Xc2/07EPwCtW6GPIhb5vIKbeEMob3dd7EMjv19c66LQ+aIIN0FW5W1fs8
 yFmqAXv8puHfLmbVkqHZlME7dMsYczuyi7SimtD8nQ2K0j/o9cg0/CCW7MMnBsCIStXC
 +nluCBugz5piHbiw+TrkAKeI2r7+Q7eZdGsZrQsCrAp9H2cGFZ44CohqV0ex/P/uH2Yy
 iZUw3tIeCTV8ZUXWfE7Xh23nkeWa6QM5W3nmhVDGvnG09ax47uM1/e4gdgw1RDFXSdaO
 j8TlLA49nQ4CMTdwV95mF5HZZo9mNSHjr3VsVeRScHEBAlHDzqxCUZe2KbsT6VkcBhyl
 3OOA==
Received: by 10.68.217.67 with SMTP id ow3mr9722389pbc.26.1350010848281;
 Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-239.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net.
 [70.36.223.239])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id po4sm3685612pbb.13.2012.10.11.20.00.45
 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <507787CF.1090705@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:00:31 -0700
From: matt <sendtomatt@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Claude Buisson <clbuisson@orange.fr>
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has
 been committed
References: <20121010004523.GA15209@lonesome.com> <5075365C.4050400@orange.fr>
In-Reply-To: <5075365C.4050400@orange.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org,
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:00:54 -0000


>>
>> I have made changes to ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk that allow the addition of
>> "USE_GCC=any" to a port's Makefile, and then committed that change to
>> various ports.  In most (but not all!) cases this will tell the port
>> "build with gcc instead of clang" (*) .
>>
>
> Why not USE_GCC ?= any for the poor guys like me who build (some) 
> ports with
> USE_GCC=4.6 ?
>
>> For those users with CC installed as gcc (including -stable), this
>> patch should have no effect.  Variations of combinations have been
>> heavily tested on pointyhat-west.  If there are any regressions, please
>> contact me.
>>
>
>

Does  this override setting CC explicitly in make.conf?
Sorry if it's a dumb question, not sure exactly the hierarchy of USE_GCC 
vs CC in the make system.

Matt