Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:45:07 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r358722 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20140623184507.GA55530@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140623165459.GR23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201406211708.s5LH8ZvE087036@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgkeu0BG5pzN1rJ=u=5VnNgmVuN2PWbay13RY7qMt7JCmA@mail.gmail.com> <20140623124533.GP23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <CAF6rxgnEficrO3dxagefxDCF8rTnByZosDGtJwdxdzmEJiLHaw@mail.gmail.com> <20140623165459.GR23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:54:59PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:37:25AM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > > I'll copy what I wrote on phabricator: > > > > If anything, the recent commits proved that this statement is exactly > > opposite of what it should be. > > > > People add entries too easily, not realizing that this file is just a > > default. This means that new entries are often too general or useless. > > > > Also, people are too discouraged to change the descriptions when they > > are useless. > > > That is your opinion other people have a different opinion here Guys, come on. There's no need to fight here. As one of the authors of a large fraction of those descriptions, I can tell you that there's nothing hard about keeping them precise yet elaborative enough. Few occasional mistakes is just a normal workflow: see it, argue on it, fix it. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140623184507.GA55530>