From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jan 1 18:58:25 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA28786 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 18:58:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA28780; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 18:58:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from bubble.didi.com (sji-ca3-217.ix.netcom.com [209.109.233.217]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA00154; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 18:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.didi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA06141; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 18:56:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 18:56:09 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199901020256.SAA06141@bubble.didi.com> To: asmodai@wxs.nl CC: kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au, ache@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai on Fri, 01 Jan 1999 20:41:55 +0100 (CET)) Subject: Re: Policy on bzip2? From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai * Just make sure the new releases of FreeBSD include bzip as standard then. Or make * it so that the dependencies require bzip. Although when we are going to bzip Yes, a BUILD_DEPENDS line is a must. And I don't think we need it to be in /usr/bin, that's exactly what dependencies are for. Why is bzip any different from, say, gmake or tcl? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message