From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org  Fri Mar 11 13:11:06 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB4EACB069;
 Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2953FF1;
 Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1aeMqG-000BRN-1e; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:10:56 +0300
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:10:56 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>,
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)
Message-ID: <20160311131055.GO70809@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <20160302235429.GD75641@FreeBSD.org>
 <20160308124016.GA70809@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20160308131847.GP1531@FreeBSD.org>
 <20160308151459.GB70809@zxy.spb.ru>
 <05A039B7-AA9A-47BB-B68E-89D9D5627D20@FreeBSD.org>
 <20160311120511.GN31877@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20160311120511.GN31877@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:11:06 -0000

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +0000, David Chisnall wrote:
> > On 8 Mar 2016, at 15:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote:
> > > 
> > 
> > In terms of comparing packages, if you’re doing that visually then you are likely to have problems anyway, unless your eyes and brain work far better than most humans.  We can make that much easier by providing libxo output in pkg and allowing you to have a simple jq script that tells you what the differences are.
> > 
> pkg can already expose the entire content of a package in json or ucl via:
> $ pkg info --raw --raw-format [json|json-conpact|yaml|ucl] name

Exposing  the entire content of a package is not a root of cause.
Question in comapring of two different setup with different behaviour
and search cause of difference.

Case of only a few monolitic packages is essentiality simple then case
of 1000 combined packages.