Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:21:33 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Chad David <davidc@issci.ca> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Objective-C threads Message-ID: <20021030172133.GB13375@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20021030091626.B58476@newton.issci.ca> References: <20021029190941.A43525@newton.issci.ca> <20021030031156.GA76120@dragon.nuxi.com> <20021029210216.A45337@newton.issci.ca> <20021030101707.GA80447@dragon.nuxi.com> <20021030091626.B58476@newton.issci.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:16:26AM -0700, Chad David wrote: > No there is no reason, and yes the changes are generic. I don't really > expect there to be many (if any) changes to libobjc that are not generic, > so if gcc-patches is the place to go, that is where I'll go. It is. > In your experience, how long is the delay between gcc-patches accepting > something and FreeBSD picking it up, ie. is it worth the effort? It all depends on where we are in our release cycle vs. GCC's. Ie, we don't update what is in /usr/src every week. We do update the GCC ports frequently (every 2 weeks or so). It is worth the effort as the toolchain maintainers may take the stance that making these changes aren't worth the maintaince effor that taking something off the vendor branch entails. So the effort is your only way to make these const'ifying changes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021030172133.GB13375>