From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 17:11:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD296106564A; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978158FC12; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.30.101.53] ([209.117.142.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9PH8att004656 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:08:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <4773.1319529109@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:08:27 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4EB3C854-0F7A-4A06-AE83-B9C6ACAB67A9@bsdimp.com> References: <4773.1319529109@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:08:38 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Adrian Chadd , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Hans Petter Selasky Subject: Re: FreeBSD-10 -> FreeBSD-9.9 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:11:34 -0000 On Oct 25, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <201110250918.28709.hselasky@c2i.net>, Hans Petter Selasky = writes: >=20 >> Why not use 9.5.x ? >=20 > I'm surprised that people even ask: Because FreeBSD is all about > doing things right and solve problems, rather than just kludge around > them ? 9.9 is a kludge until the auto config scripts that still "support" = freebsd 1.x due to some mistaken cargo-cult programming are fixed to = de-stupify them. That code has been cut and paste for like 18 years, = but maybe for the past 13 years it hasn't worked in the projects it used = to work on (since they've moved on) and in many it never worked and = likely hasn't been tested in at least 10 years due to the difficulty in = even getting FreeBSD 1.x systems to test with prior to the lifting of = the bans put in place to settle the AT&T lawsuit. As such, the offending code should be fixed, not just patched around = with bogus version numbers. Warner