Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 May 2007 11:04:47 -0700
From:      Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
To:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: RFC: Removing file(1)+libmagic(3) from the base system
Message-ID:  <4654823F.8000502@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0705231346400.9867@sea.ntplx.net>
References:  <46546E16.9070707@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0705231346400.9867@sea.ntplx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007, Colin Percival wrote:
>> Can anyone make a strong argument for keeping this code in the base
>> system?
> 
> Yes, because other OS's have it (file) in their base, and because
> it is a POSIX-defined utility.

To be fair, POSIX does define it as being optional.

> Please consider this a strong no.

Noted.

Colin Percival



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4654823F.8000502>