From owner-freebsd-arch Wed May 23 1:50:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD65137B424 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 01:50:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4N8oKL79942; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:50:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Brian Somers Cc: Peter Wemm , Garrett Wollman , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: unit_list routines In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 May 2001 09:15:41 BST." <200105230815.f4N8FfC20001@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:50:20 +0200 Message-ID: <79940.990607820@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200105230815.f4N8FfC20001@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>, Brian Somers write s: >The rman stuff seems to be overkill: > >unit_list just concerns itself with allocating a bunch of int ranges. > >Do you really think it's appropriate to try to re-use the rman stuff >for what I want to do ? If using rman means less readable code more arcane magic parameters larger binaries Then the answer is no... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message