From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 13 20:27:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BFF16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:27:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ip192.186.dsl-acs2.seawa0.iinet.com
	[209.20.186.192])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F35C43D3F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:27:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from randy@psg.com)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ran.psg.com.psg.com)
	by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1BkTrs-000JMM-LW; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:27:12 -0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16628.17824.155529.989531@ran.psg.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:27:12 -0700
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <16628.17408.87798.143913@ran.psg.com>
	<24511.1089750154@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CVSUP and 5.2.1 RELEASE 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:27:13 -0000

>> i meant my question seriously.  when should i use 'make world',
> I use it a lot for testing, I know a lot of people use it
> with DESTDIR=/disk/next_jail and similar.

ok.  makes sense.

> The point here is that people who shoot their own feet off with
> make world isn't going to stop doing so just because your
> rename it to "make buildworld installworld"

some will, some won't.  life's like that.  but if there was no
use for it, i would have been inclined to remove it.  given it
is useful, i have no problem keeping it.

randy