From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Dec 7 16:41:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD0037B401 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from fubar.adept.org (fubar.adept.org [63.147.172.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4CC43EC5 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:41:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@adept.org) Received: by fubar.adept.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D423E15247; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:38:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fubar.adept.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F4D15213 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:38:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:38:51 -0800 (PST) From: Mike Hoskins To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELEASE crash - SCSI related? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20021207163639.I5356-100000@fubar.adept.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 7 Dec 2002, Dan Pelleg wrote: > level I could be doing. For example, am I more likely to come up cleanly if > I turn softupdates off? FWIW, I believe the mythos around softupdates faded some time ago. According to LINT, # Soft updates is technique for improving file system speed and # making abrupt shutdown less risky. options SOFTUPDATES So I think you'll be better off with softupdates enabled. Good luck! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message