From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 23 14:33:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA22649 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 May 1996 14:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kitten.mcs.com (Kitten.mcs.com [192.160.127.90]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA22641 for ; Thu, 23 May 1996 14:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from venus.mcs.com (root@Venus.mcs.com [192.160.127.92]) by kitten.mcs.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA21593; Thu, 23 May 1996 16:33:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: by venus.mcs.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.5) id ; Thu, 23 May 96 16:33 CDT Message-Id: Subject: Re: ISDN Compression Load on CPU To: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 16:33:34 -0500 (CDT) From: "Karl Denninger, MCSNet" Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199605232131.RAA29233@etinc.com> from "Dennis" at May 23, 96 05:31:23 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >> Karl D. writes... > >> > >> >Again, note - no spinning media, no PC-bus issues.... > >> > >> I really hate this garbage argument. Novell servers with uptimes > >> over a year are commonplace...PC bus, spinning media and all. > >> you only have problems with drives that are too fast, too hot and > >> too overworked, which simply isnt the case with a router scenario. > >> > >> Dennis > > > >Yeah, and I have BSD boxes with uptimes in the hundreds of days too. > > > >I also have CISCOs under management with uptimes measured in *years*. One > >in particular with an uptime of over *four* years. The *normal* reason > >that these CISCOs reboot is because the power goes away (usually > >intentionally and for maintenance purposes). An awful lot of the > >*CORE* hardware on my backbone has never had an unsolicited reload, > >and it works VERY hard. > > Gee, my provider uses Ciscos and they're doing "maintenance" on them > like once a month. Software upgrade or not...if you bring it down, it ain't > up "for years", and I cant imagine anyone still using the crap that cisco > was selling 4 years ago without upgrading..... Gee, your provider might have other issues. > >In general, moving parts mean lower reliability. Further, not one PC > >(or component) builder in 1000 knows item #1 about thermal engineering, > >which is why all those drives, power supplies, and motherboards burn up > >and burn out. Fans on processors? With REAL MTBFs in the > >single-digit-thousand hour ranges? Yeah, right. > > For someone whos rich and idealistic, yeah :-). > > I'll bet that if you asked 100 people if they'd deal with a crash every 8 or 9 > months to save $10,000 on a box they'd go for it 98 to 2, and we know > who 1 of those 2 would be..... If the numbers were anything CLOSE to what you are citing here, you'd have a point. They're not, and you know it. I've lived in this world for 15 years and built real, no-nonsense commercial networks the entire time. Reality isn't a dream, or a wish, its reality... I also have no financial stake in this debate or my position in it. That is, no firm which I own, operate, work for or own stock in wins or loses if you (or I) am right. You do. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity Modem: [+1 312 248-0900] | T1 from $600 monthly; speeds to DS-3 available Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1] | 21 Chicagoland POPs, ISDN, 28.8, much more Fax: [+1 312 248-9865] | Email to "info@mcs.net" WWW: http://www.mcs.net/ ISDN - Get it here TODAY! | Home of Chicago's only FULL Clarinet feed!