From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 27 14:43:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA18EA1F5A1 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fonz@skysmurf.nl) Received: from biertje.skysmurf.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:984:78b5:1:21b:78ff:fea8:3f22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7239B1929; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fonz@skysmurf.nl) Received: from biertje.skysmurf.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by biertje.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t9REh4NW092528; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:43:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz@biertje.skysmurf.nl) Received: (from fonz@localhost) by biertje.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t9REh408092527; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:43:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:43:04 +0100 From: "A.J. \"Fonz\" van Werven" To: Kubilay Kocak Cc: FreeBSD ports mailing list Subject: Re: Help needed: ports builds on 10.X but breaks on 9.X Message-ID: <20151027144304.GB92455@biertje.skysmurf.nl> References: <20151003090630.GA14086@biertje.skysmurf.nl> <20151025151605.GA13444@biertje.skysmurf.nl> <562CF667.1030007@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <562CF667.1030007@FreeBSD.org> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:43:07 -0000 --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kubilay Kocak wrote: > Set merge-quarterly to ? in the bugzilla issue report, and ask (in a > comment) for the committer who resolved it in ports HEAD to kindly merge > it :) Thanks to you and Kurt Jaeger for the help. The committer in question has now reassigned it to the security team so I'll wait and see what happens. Also thanks for the additional information Koobs. This does leave me with one question: just when is it appropriate to set the merge-quarterly flag? Apparently quarterly fallout is one example and security fixes are another. But is there anything else? AvW --=20 I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWL414AAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8TQ4P+gIbtofDZM0KkCrIdbHVhznA FHxxUvEArm4bwDyosWDSCJk1Dcm23T0N0jS/sKDWCaiQwFegLE4QNOTqrJ+K0/+g HtXtx725QVzzU7anAvL5sGYWPDY41A9fMttgQr1fRYbaD8HTfDAVc+f1IUVrF9mL +yTnxrqMPj9ZnAAl3THkj08VSut7m5Vg79E6Ng09NwaNkuF4+n0GGMxqYPgpQ3Fq Cw4q0nHaMe7feINNBMLLCiJIZ4d8HDCSqeMBf4NKUURmpnJrZG54D90UvlPZV6xm gb4TRgdQ0tVgdm5eWrQRXr6wNUMPpByIrzF+g13jHN6u3jg2oh+m2H8mSEncEbMw dD6vM3R7BLkKvrcGdcvyT2eycbm6f0wdQykuu/6q3NoRfqmatD3J0DKiTJoSViBa b+TxqyrxCc2J0dz1mDH0DnvfRL9mGvCOSpjt0TtiS3pYUgt4hzX0CswyMxCLvzXn QpcYBNA8Hxds6bU43EmOs1zWJOwpuxFEfLfL2BW+9qg9JSBcRStwIKeSbY/WZ6r5 SUPUET0jm4FBHq3qFGCLY+tbDBI2/LHMc+WLKca0wk761zoB4yNRVmoOOeTFOldL xdq++/7U/9Y7ws12Q1Fe7kS+a14wtF0LXtC7n0yrN+32Y7bf8o0GC3lHc1d+HKLq f3pHq8JKA6KP4HWHajU2 =25UW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4--