From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 19 14:20:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E2B14BE0 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 1999 14:20:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B87501C4A; Sun, 19 Dec 1999 17:20:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5043381B; Sun, 19 Dec 1999 17:20:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 17:20:13 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Warner Losh Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCCARD vs GENERIC In-Reply-To: <199912192215.PAA07646@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 19 Dec 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > 4) The xe and wi drivers are not enabled in GENERIC but are in > PCCARD. No reason at all not to have them in GENERIC. > > I think that the 40k that we saved in removal of old cdrom devices > would more than make up for the extra pcic/pccard/wi/xe devices, but > I'm biased. I'd love to see the xe driver in GENERIC, however I'd also love to see it _working_, not just compiling. My recent attempts to look at the code have proven just how little I know about device drivers. I have a few of these cards Warner, and would send one (you could even send me those cards I gave you at the con and I'll send one of these in that box.. :->). -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message