Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:30:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org> Cc: Anthony Chavez <acc@hexadecagram.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 or ZFS for 3TB disk? Message-ID: <20081022152845.I2152@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20081022053545.GA49412@icarus.home.lan> References: <gdmcc6$7bt$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081022053545.GA49412@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
. . lots of explanations how to make ZFS "stable" and usable deleted after reading. . . > > IMHO, you should be using ZFS for what you want to accomplish. If you > do go the UFS2 route, I would recommend you set background_fsck="no" in definitely yes. but UFS works fine on 10TB volume :) and works FAST. just use larger blocks and fragments (like 4-8K fragment) and reduce inode numbers - without this fsck will take REALLY long.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081022152845.I2152>