From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 10:47:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 282A517A for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB5B127E for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7126E9C; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 989BEAA4; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:47:28 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Joe Holden Subject: Re: Proposal References: <9eeba1ab-2ab0-4188-82aa-686c5573a5db@me.com> <8D81F198-36A7-47F4-B486-DA059910A6B4@spam.lifeforms.nl> <867g6y1kfe.fsf@nine.des.no> <86d2gqz2he.fsf@nine.des.no> <5345C98D.7030907@rewt.org.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:47:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5345C98D.7030907@rewt.org.uk> (Joe Holden's message of "Wed, 09 Apr 2014 23:28:29 +0100") Message-ID: <86bnw95um7.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:47:30 -0000 Joe Holden writes: > IME issues like this need to be patched first, tested later [...] If we'd done that and screwed up, you'd be on the barricades demanding our heads. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no