Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:13:48 +0200 From: Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: bruno@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: powerd adaptive mode latching Message-ID: <478965CC.1010609@moneybookers.com> In-Reply-To: <47894263.6010706@root.org> References: <200801110909.m0B99tlr097501@lurza.secnetix.de> <47873840.7050401@moneybookers.com> <47894263.6010706@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Lawson wrote: > I am not sure this patch should be committed as-is. It might be better > centralized in the cpufreq mid-layer so that all drivers benefit instead > of just acpi_perf. If there are frequencies that are too close to each > other (no matter what the source driver), it might be good to eliminate > them. > > I'll look into it later today. > > -Nate > I fully agree that centralized solution is better. But at this late stage of RELENG_7_0, I'm happy with this patch, as it solves our problem and is very simple. If you can come with something better before 7-RELEASE, it's OK, but otherwise I think we should have this patch in the CVS and then RELENG_7_0 (even marked as XXX) The other patch actually is in powerd.c and with it doesn't matter what is the source of the information, but I personally, more like the acpi_perf patch :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?478965CC.1010609>