Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:53:47 +0100 From: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@schweikhardt.net> To: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: posix compliance Message-ID: <20120229185347.GE3020@schweikhardt.net> In-Reply-To: <20120228102953.GA56305@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120228102953.GA56305@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anton, On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:29:53AM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: # I asked in question@, probably this is a better place to ask. # # Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? Partially. BSD does not want to hide its heritage and we attempt to not break existing code and scripts by silently changing behavior. So in a few places you will find that the POSIX way is not quite the BSD way. # The info here is a bit out of date: # # http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html For utilities, you might also want to check http://people.freebsd.org/~schweikh/posix-utilities.html which I started a long time ago. Regards, Jens -- Jens Schweikhardt http://www.schweikhardt.net/ SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120229185347.GE3020>