Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:51:03 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, dim@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/149051: [request] No document for clang or clang++ Message-ID: <20120223045103.GA96433@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgm0SrOxbLBOhJMHfd1SpeWP=iXueHEHkphVQSx%2BFXiXeQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201202230247.q1N2l4SJ010698@freefall.freebsd.org> <20120223033151.GA96158@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAF6rxgm0SrOxbLBOhJMHfd1SpeWP=iXueHEHkphVQSx%2BFXiXeQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:17:35PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Steve Kargl > <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > >> > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149051 > > > > Perhaps, I'm misreading the 'State-Changed-From-To' > > field. ??Why was this pr closed? ??I have a 1 week > > old -current. ??'man clang[++]' does not give a > > manual page. > > I have a clang++ man page and > > Date: Wed Oct 12 17:25:49 2011 > New Revision: 226310 > > from the PR seems to add one. > I forgot that the system I checked has WITHOUT_CLANG defined, so the man pages of course are no installed. Sorry about the noise, and thanks for reaping the PR. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120223045103.GA96433>