From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 12 01:31:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4F13416A4CE; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 01:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geekpunk.net (adsl-76-147-31.bna.bellsouth.net [216.76.147.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EE1FE43D39; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 01:31:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bandix@geekpunk.net)
Received: from localhost.my.domain (taran [127.0.0.1])
	by geekpunk.net (8.12.8p1/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i1C9VAvC009397;
	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:31:10 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from bandix@geekpunk.net)
Received: (from bandix@localhost)
	by localhost.my.domain (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id i1C9VAW7009396;
	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:31:10 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:31:09 -0600
From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <brandon@dvalentine.com>
To: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20040212093109.GH423@geekpunk.net>
References: <20040212091114.GG423@geekpunk.net> <402B45B4.7090003@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <402B45B4.7090003@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: patch: ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk:add-plist-docs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:31:14 -0000

On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 10:21:56AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> 
> >Now, all of the ports I've seen do this have a corresponding:
> >
> >    %%PORTDOCS%%@rmdir %%DOCSDIR%%
> >
> >or similiar in their pkg-plist.  If NOPORTDOCS is defined, then a
> >deinstall of these ports will complain about not being able to remove
> >DOCSDIR due to that line in the pkg-plist.
> 
> No, if you installed the port with -DNOPORTDOCS, pkg_deinstall will not 
> try to remove the DOCSDIR. The %%PORTDOCS%% macro will in fact be 
> substituted by "@comment ", like for the doc files.

Ah!  You're right.  I missed that.  Makes more sense now.  Thank you!

Brandon D. Valentine
-- 
brandon@dvalentine.com                           http://www.geekpunk.net
Pseudo-Random Googlism:  february is african