From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 3 11: 3:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from kweetal.tue.nl (kweetal.tue.nl [131.155.2.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8955137B850 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 11:03:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcov@toad.stack.nl) Received: from hermes.tue.nl [131.155.2.46] by kweetal.tue.nl (8.9.3) for id UAA26893 (ESMTP); Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:03:11 +0200 (MDT) Received: from deathstar (n103.dial.tue.nl [131.155.209.102]) by hermes.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6692E802 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:03:09 +0200 (CEST) From: "Marco van de Voort" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:02:11 +0100 Subject: Re: GDB 5 In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b) Message-Id: <20000403180309.EB6692E802@hermes.tue.nl> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The reason is that the patches against 4.18 you guys use were never > assigned to the FSF. Or so, that's the reason i was given when i asked > the head maintainer. > I'm not here to get into any fights. I just maintain C++ support for GDB, > and use FreeBSD as my secondary platform, and my main gdb testing > platform (Since BeOS is my first platform). Not necesarily. The FPC team did send OBJPAS patches against 4.18 to the GDB team, and they just "forgot" them. When we resubmitted, the freeze was already a fact. Marco van de Voort (MarcoV@Stack.nl) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message