From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Sep 3 17:36:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D204D37B40B; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 17:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f840gRn03534; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 17:42:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200109040042.f840gRn03534@mass.dis.org> To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD defaults? (was: Re: Tuning UDP for NFS) In-Reply-To: Message from Jordan Hubbard of "Sun, 02 Sep 2001 19:53:41 PDT." <20010902195341S.jkh@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 17:42:27 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > As to Erez, I must confess to having no recollection whatsoever of him > or his request for an account. Does anyone else in core remember this > or am I the only one with advanced alzheimers around here? :) Check the minutes. 8) But as Robert has observed, David is the real Alzheimers' case here; he was told at Usenix that Erez' account had been approved. I suspect that David's subsequent worryload had simply buried the fact. For general reference, since people are likely to be interested, the delay within -core over approving another "external developer" account was related to lengthy discussion over the risks and tradeoffs related to the entire "external developer" model. There are a number of distinct opinions within core, and concerns regarding the security of the repository are likely to drive some more changes in the future. Regardless, we still need to provide external developers with resources, thus Erez was approved. Regards, Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message