From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Mar 24 18:33:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA01738 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 18:33:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA01701 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 18:33:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from tyger.inna.net (root@tyger.inna.net [206.151.66.1]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id RAA16315 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 17:12:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from dolphin.inna.net (jamie@dolphin.inna.net [206.151.66.2]) by tyger.inna.net (8.8.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA19426; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 20:13:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 20:11:55 -0500 (EST) From: Jamie Bowden To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Michael Smith , dg@root.com, mishania@demos.su, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2.1 - rumours? In-Reply-To: <27971.859224682@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 24 Mar 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > So the answer is - if people like Mishania want to see less frequent > release then they're going to have to work A WHOLE LOT HARDER on > the BETAs and the GAMMAs! We had GAMMA out for a month and hardly > anyone tested it. Maybe if I only gave people an hour before removing > the bits again, they'd be more motivated, but giving them plenty > of time does NOT appear to work at all. :-) I would like to say that we have gamma still running on one of our boxes, and have had no trouble with it (even playing with the bt848 driver). The box in question is unfortunately not scsi, so we missed the scsi driver problems :(. Hopefully we will have a box with a *940 card in it soon for the sole purpose of being on the edge :). Jamie Bowden Network Administrator, TBI Ltd.