From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 22 16: 1:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from a.mx.everquick.net (a.mx.everquick.net [216.89.137.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F214537B406 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:01:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net) Received: from localhost (eddy@localhost) by a.mx.everquick.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f5MN1jG12657 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:01:45 GMT X-EverQuick-No-Abuse: Report any e-mail abuse to Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:01:44 +0000 (GMT) From: "E.B. Dreger" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: question: aio / nbio / kqueue Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quick question, hopefully not too basic for this list: AIO vs. non-blocking IO vs. kernel queues I'm familiar with (and *love*) kernel queues. Non-blocking IO is straightforward. AIO seems simple enough. My question is, from a performance standpoint, in what situations are these techniques most appropriate? TIA, Eddy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. EverQuick Internet Division Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap To: blacklist@brics.com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to , or you are likely to be blocked. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message