Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:07:48 +0200 From: Paul Schenkeveld <fb-hackers@psconsult.nl> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <mbsd@pacbell.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridge config in /etc/rc (patch) Message-ID: <20030513100747.A30389@psconsult.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030507205330.E310@atlas.home>; from mbsd@pacbell.net on Wed, May 07, 2003 at 08:58:56PM -0700 References: <1052346312.414067.669.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> <20030507205330.E310@atlas.home>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi All,
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 08:58:56PM -0700, Mikko Työläjärvi wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2003 .@babolo.ru wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Interesting... IF new builtin command will be written,
> > has it chance to be accepted?
> > such as "list prefix" lists all sh variables with
> > names prefix* ?
>
> You mean something like:
>
> list_prefix() {
> eval "set |
> while read v; do case \$v in $1*) echo \"\${v%%=*}\";; esac; done"
> }
Please be ware of the following:
# rc.conf snippet
static_routes="goodyear \
firestone \
bridgestone"
route_goodyear="... "
route_firestone="... "
route_bridgestone="... "
bridge_foo="... "
bridge_bar="... "
Now `list_prefix bridge` will also list bridgestone because multi-line
variables will not be properly detected by list_prefix.
> It forks an extra process, I know...
>
> $.02,
> /Mikko
$2e-2
Paul Schenkeveld
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030513100747.A30389>