From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 12 04:52:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853F216A4CE for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 04:52:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from v00051.home.net.pl (post.pl [212.85.96.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 507CF43D62 for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 04:52:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@post.pl) Received: from localhost (HELO ?10.0.2.100?) (steve.post@home@127.0.0.1) by matrix01.home.net.pl with SMTP; Thu, 12 May 2005 04:52:44 -0000 Message-ID: <4282E139.7030908@post.pl> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 06:53:13 +0200 From: Steven Jurczyk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <4281FBC9.5040506@post.pl> <4096.212.12.51.89.1115816916.squirrel@212.12.51.89> <3aaaa3a050511162864263c74@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a050511162864263c74@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: Marian Hettwer Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 04:52:47 -0000 Chris wrote: >Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4 >onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning >on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month. > >Have you guys tried this without SMP? > > Yes. pthreads applications under SCHED_ULE but without SMP works OK... PS. Please remeber that SCHED_ULE with SMP brokes also >10 utils compiled with pthreads in base system (host, dig, nslookup -> all DNS stuff). -- best regards steve at home.pl