From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 18:35:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7857716A518 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:35:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.mi.is (smtp.mi.is [217.151.180.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56E643D45 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:35:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thib@mi.is) Received: from caulfield (bofh.bitcode.org [217.151.165.254]) by smtp.mi.is (8.12.10/8.12.10/1.0.1) with SMTP id i7IIZKiv023167 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:35:20 GMT Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:35:29 +0000 From: "Thordur Ivar B." To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040818183529.5c52521b.thib@mi.is> In-Reply-To: <20040818123706.T887@acropolis.argolis.org> References: <20040818121102.95460.qmail@web52402.mail.yahoo.com> <20040818142511.390043af.thib@mi.is> <20040818144948.GA55534@pc5.i.0x5.de> <20040818162355.08596948.thib@mi.is> <20040818123706.T887@acropolis.argolis.org> Organization: n/a X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: chfn, date, chsh INFECTED according to chkrootkit X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:35:23 -0000 On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:41:42 -0400 (EDT) Matt Piechota wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Thordur Ivar B. wrote: > > > Yes ofcourse you will need to trust your own toolchain and compiler (I keep > > "trusted" binarys on CD to use in cases like this. (And for post-mortem > > inspection.) > > I'm curious, where do the "trusted" binaries come from? In theory, > the FreeBSD build machine could have been hacked a long time ago and the > hack keeps propagating. > > -- > Matt Piechota Note the "" around trusted. There is no way (besieds manually going through the entire src-tree to be sure that the sources are "trust worthy" but I have the highest confident of the administrative personnel wich keep's the source safe and the machines uncomprimised and the developers in general. If I did not "trust" them I would simply shutdown my machines, remove the caples and throw it out the window. My $0.05 -- Kv, thib[att]mi{dot}is A man can do as he will, but not will as he will. -- Arthur Schopenhauer