Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:31:29 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>, FreeBSD quest <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Dependencies after port tree update Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301181030480.97948@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20130118165130.73cea17d.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <op.wq3bi4ikqhadp0@freebsd> <20130118055051.3dd2a12a.freebsd@edvax.de> <op.wq35o5ujqhadp0@freebsd> <20130118165130.73cea17d.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:37:43 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> Do the following directories have to be "more" empty? ... > If you have copied everything you might need from /usr/local > (e. g. config files in /usr/local/etc) you can remove the > whole directory subtree and recreate it using mtree (from > the /etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist description). Yes, but it is not required. I've never done it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1301181030480.97948>