From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Aug 10 14:33:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F9E37B405; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:32:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7ALWqg37835; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:32:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:32:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200108102132.f7ALWqg37835@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CFR: fseek<0 + feof error (with fix) In-Reply-To: <20010811010820.A16395@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20010810232939.A14964@nagual.pp.ru> <20010810234922.A15324@nagual.pp.ru> <200108102100.f7AL03x37506@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010811010820.A16395@nagual.pp.ru> Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > As it says, "the resulting file offset would be a value which cannot be > represented correctly" and it cannot be, because range overflow occurse in > the calculation process, not given directly in arguments, as for EINVAL. I do not think your interpretation reflects the intent of the text. Perhaps this question should be raised on the Austin Group list. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message