Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 06:19:32 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: David Thiel <lx@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/shotwell Makefile ports/graphics/shotwell/files patch-Makefile Message-ID: <20120308061932.GB68664@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120308031131.GE88589@redundancy.redundancy.org> References: <201203072041.q27KfZEj002244@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120308030757.GA51439@FreeBSD.org> <20120308031131.GE88589@redundancy.redundancy.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 07:11:55PM -0800, David Thiel wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:07:33AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:41:35PM +0000, David Thiel wrote: > > > [...] > > > Feature safe: yes > > > > Any reason for using FS tag here? > > Was there just in case we'd hit the upcoming feature freeze while I > wasn't looking. Does using it have side effects? In case you'd "hit" the freeze without noticing (although I expect people do read mail and pay attention on announcements of such importancy), pre-commit check would have caught it for you. No need to make wild guesses. As for rationale against abusing it outside a slush, please see my email on port-committers@ from 27 Feb, msgid <20120227070603.GA86372@FreeBSD.org>. Just couple of weeks ago, not sure why you didn't see it. In short, while there are no *technical* problems with this tag, it's confusing to see it outside feature freeze, which also kinda makes entire idea behind it vague. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120308061932.GB68664>