Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:05:06 +0100 From: Big Lebowski <spankthespam@gmail.com> To: "Gary J. Hayers" <gary@hayers.org> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays? Message-ID: <CAHcXP%2Bei%2BWXWT7sEPSEz3V8YsOQPxPQcHAR%2B=UacP-GYLo3Smg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52E50F33.6080307@hayers.org> References: <CAHcXP%2Bf6e-t--XbQPTH1goJp_CL7P=zTj5trZVWd4YZ_EsO9gw@mail.gmail.com> <52E2FA36.5080106@marino.st> <CAHcXP%2BfRDeKXjz0_sifgzeXC2dA-eDnoV5NH1yvF2D6R8JRmAg@mail.gmail.com> <52E303CB.6020304@marino.st> <CAHcXP%2Be9p2HrQ=M9HmPecMbWtXRuYPzH9kwfLGqgdrUrhvLuEA@mail.gmail.com> <52E30990.2060903@marino.st> <CAHcXP%2BfQC-N4ZKpmpaCQSeYnw4WqOJ4T4pdsoMC6NpshsOm6sQ@mail.gmail.com> <52E398FF.9000300@FreeBSD.org> <CAHcXP%2Bd8a-dcaMHM0y=7PcBReZy6J8eaANLHTDBb-=fM4cmjVw@mail.gmail.com> <52E50DBA.4010807@hayers.org> <CAHcXP%2Bc3-fAhuwdBoHAmks3ugA_-G_pasYtavvsrdYdTJqXmkg@mail.gmail.com> <52E50F33.6080307@hayers.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Gary J. Hayers <gary@hayers.org> wrote: > > > On 26/01/2014 13:32, Big Lebowski wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Gary J. Hayers <gary@hayers.org> wrote: >> >>> Suspect this would work, however, the more committers the less the >>> quality >>> of work? >>> >> Is there any evidence to support that argument? Or is it just a fear of >> that? At any point if that happens, then this can be revoked, the >> selection >> can be tighter, things can be adjusted, nothing is written in stone. Also, >> people were mentioning existing commiters to be sloppy and problematic, >> we've months of waiting for PR's to be taken care of, and there are still >> ports accepted that dont work at all - is that this work quality we're so >> troubled for? >> >> B. >> > > That's a fear admittedly, but your solution would take care of that, would > that also mean a bigger portmgr team too? > > At no point I've suggested anything regarding portmgr team, and I am not in position to judge needs of any changes in that place. It seems however, that with the portsmgr-lurker project they're handling their situation in a good way. B. > > -- > > Regards, > Gary J. Hayers > gary@hayers.org > > PGP Signature > http://www.hayers.org/pgp > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHcXP%2Bei%2BWXWT7sEPSEz3V8YsOQPxPQcHAR%2B=UacP-GYLo3Smg>