From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 31 20:35:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165D216A41F for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:35:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.bawue.com) Received: from voodoo.bawue.com (voodoo.bawue.com [212.9.161.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9334043D48 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:35:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.bawue.com) Received: from krion by voodoo.bawue.com with local (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EWgNn-0009Ou-A8; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:35:55 +0100 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:35:55 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20051031203555.GE36495@voodoo.bawue.com> References: <200510312006.j9VK6pRw034243@freefall.freebsd.org> <52412306@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52412306@srv.sem.ipt.ru> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/88291: [update] devel/smc: UNBREAK port (size mismatch) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:35:56 -0000 On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:27:57PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > The patch is trivial, but what is changed in tarball and why it was > > rerolled 4 5 6 7 Can you provide this info 4 5 6 7 > > You see, I'm only reading the message at FreeBSD-ports@ list... > ----- > From: linimon@FreeBSD.org > Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken > ----- > > ... and trying to do my best to unbreak some of the ports. Hence, I > don't use the port. Nevertheless I did all recommended steps to check > that patch. > > If you say that the info you asked is vital, I'll try to get in touch > with the developers. But according to > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=8964 > > the sources weren't touch since 2005-09-19 08:41. If tarball was rerolled, new features/bugs were added/removed, hence, checksum is changed, committers/submitters should provide an info about changed sources in tarball and describe it in the commit message. > And sorry, I didn't catch what does "4 5 6 7" mean? Is it a secret > password? ;-) 7 8 9 10 No, it's some bugs in our internal scripts, sorry for that. -Kirill