From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 15:08:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5784616A4CE; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:08:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from eddie.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.113.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C029743D1F; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:08:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (zaphod.bofh [192.168.2.10]) by eddie.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AD31169F; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:08:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id 0B6081189F; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:08:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:08:06 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Alexey Zelkin Message-ID: <20040311230805.GC825@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <200403112210.i2BMAEgn050693@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040311224750.GA20712@phantom.cris.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040311224750.GA20712@phantom.cris.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org cc: "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: www/64120: /mnt/www/en/ports/needs to be re-run X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:08:09 -0000 --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004.03.12 00:47:50 +0200, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:10:14PM -0800, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > =20 > > The proper solution is of course not to use INDEX from CVS but a fresh= ly > > build one, but I don't have the time to implement that at the moment. >=20 > IMO, The proper solution is to leave it as is. Even using INDEX www/en/p= orts > is most time and cpu consuming part (except *maybe* doc/) of www tree. > We don't need to get www builder machine into yet another ports index > tester. I didn't make myself clear enough. I don't want the WWW build to build ports/INDEX - I agree that would be a bad idea. The idea I have been thinking about was e.g. using the INDEX file already generated elsewhere (e.g. the INDEX tinderbox kris already runs) for the build on www. But it was just an idea, and I have no plans to work on that at the moment. Also I haven't looked more closely into the consequences of doing this (with regards to mirrors). --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAUPFVh9pcDSc1mlERAqCzAJ45ixJ8JJdnEjGi1DS9r/pYXuGE4wCgu23A /ncQD/wAHatowfvXSRhDcq4= =E7Ip -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI--