Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 09:26:00 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237973] pf: implement egress keyword to simplify rules across different hardware Message-ID: <bug-237973-7501-jvKOPhjGDQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237973-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237973-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237973 --- Comment #15 from Goran Meki=C4=87 <meka@tilda.center> --- (In reply to Alexander V. Chernikov from comment #14) Continuing on what you wrote, I can see PF implementing something internal, then IPFW doing similar and we end up with a need for common implementation, which got me wondering should existing grouping algorithm be altered so that groups are per FIB? Of course, groups like bridge, lagg and epair, just to = name the few, should be present in all FIBs on the corresponding interfaces. I k= now it's far from trivial to do such a thing, but just thinking about it, with = the knowledge I currently (don't) have it sounds like it would be beneficial to many apps if groups were per FIB. What do you all think? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237973-7501-jvKOPhjGDQ>