From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Apr 13 15:20:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA04097 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 15:20:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from klemm.gtn.com (klemm-isdn.gtn.com [194.77.2.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA04001; Mon, 13 Apr 1998 22:20:36 GMT (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA11882; Tue, 14 Apr 1998 00:20:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980414002026.18737@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 00:20:26 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: Satoshi Asami Cc: searle@longacre.demon.co.uk, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: need newer qt lib version for netscape-qt update References: <19980412122308.64737@klemm.gtn.com> <199804122226.PAA08008@bubble.didi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <199804122226.PAA08008@bubble.didi.com>; from Satoshi Asami on Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 03:26:07PM -0700 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 03:26:07PM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Ok. Currently I have a ready to commit libqt 1.33, which should > * be a stable version. Should we do a repository copy with it > * or simply bump the (-stable) 1.31 port ? What do you think ? > > If you think it's stable and compatible enough with the current port, > just overwrite it. Ok. > * The next round would be a rep copy for 1.39-snap or 1.40-snap ? > > Yeah, I guess so. Then you commit it over the rep-copied port, we > wait for it to become "stable" enough, and then delete the old qt > port. (Assuming there aren't any compatibility issues, of course.) I have the 1.39 snap port ready, but nethack-qt doesn't compile :-/ Well, we'll have perhaps to wait for another snap or a stable release for that. Somebody who needs a SNAP or should we bump 1.31 to 1.33 and wait for 1.39 or 1.40 ? > By the way, are you (or anyone else) working on a mozilla-qt port? No, sorry. > I think it will be really great to have a non-Motif version of netscape > (I hear it's smaller too). Hmm, interesting ! More interesting, since it doesn't compile with our lesstif version ... the mozilla port wants a static motif lib to build, which we don't have with lesstif ... -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message