From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 28 00:00:16 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F161065695
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from traveling08@cox.net)
Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (fed1rmmtao106.cox.net [68.230.241.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154748FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net
	(InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id
	<20091028000015.JZPK21192.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>;
	Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:00:15 -0400
Received: from asus64 ([72.220.91.251]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp
	id y00F1c00F5RPd340400FKA; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:00:15 -0400
X-VR-Score: -180.00
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=PQhMOY2zTJoA:10 a=8pif782wAAAA:8
	a=nFgQRaWqfcrZkmX7OI8A:9 a=13OsrDeggEsq_hTlBM0fblTaQSIA:4
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:00:10 -0700
From: Robert <traveling08@cox.net>
To: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@msu.edu>
Message-ID: <20091027170010.0ac1550f@asus64>
In-Reply-To: <20091027230025.GA92658@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>
References: <4AE5F897.3000103@rawbw.com> <200910271703.12828.gnemmi@gmail.com>
	<20091027213134.GA85815@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>
	<200910272046.00289.gnemmi@gmail.com>
	<20091027230025.GA92658@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why is sendmail is part of the system and not a package?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:16 -0000

On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:00:25 -0400
Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@msu.edu> wrote:


> > 
> > Fit the bill ...  well.. so did the Geocentric model .. and it
> > actually did work just as fine .. and even better yet since it also
> > mantained the "status quo" ! ... but then Galileo came and you know
> > the rest of the story ...
> 
> Actually it didn't.   It didn't describe observable conditions and
> events.
> 
It appears that Copernicus built his bike shed 100 years before Galileo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copernicus