From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 09:58:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800551065670 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FC98FC1F for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1R9tad0086234; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:55:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n1R9tZXw086233; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:55:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:55:35 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: Craig Rodrigues Message-ID: <20090227095535.GA86019@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Craig Rodrigues , Sean Bruno , FreeBSD Current References: <1235502625.4345.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090224192950.GA93786@crodrigues.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090224192950.GA93786@crodrigues.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:56:40 +0100 (CET) Cc: Sean Bruno , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Default FS Layout Too Small? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:58:04 -0000 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 07:29:50PM +0000, Craig Rodrigues typed: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:10:25AM -0800, Sean Bruno wrote: > > I would assume that the default would be much larger now-a-days. I think > > a simple doubling to 1G would be sufficient. > > Is there any point these days to having sysinstall auto-default to creating > separate slices for /tmp, /var/, /usr........ > when setting up new systems, I've started just ignoring > the sysinstall auto-defaults and making one big / partition > and installing FreeBSD there.... > > It seems every release we need to keep bumping up the size of > the sysinstall auto-defaults because they are too small. > > This bites new users. How could changing the defaults bite new users who are by definition not used to any defaults yet?