From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 20:07:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627A916A41F; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:07:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274DA43D45; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:07:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [10.251.17.229]) ([10.251.17.229]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2006 12:07:10 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true Message-ID: <43D142EE.9080601@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:07:10 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050727 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <43D13F35.1030308@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <43D13F35.1030308@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Daniel Eischen , Gleb Smirnoff , current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: kernel thread as real threads.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:07:11 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > >> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote: >> >>> Does pthreads allow the programmer to name threads in a user and/or >>> kernel visible way? Is this something that is really all that >>> important? >> >> >> >> Only in a non-portable way. See pthread_set_name_np(3). >> > > Well, for the time being, I can't see why we can't specifically > name kthreads and use the process name for user threads. that's what happens with my patches already.. > > Scott