From owner-freebsd-security Tue Nov 9 0:30:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D67F14C22; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 00:30:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA22400; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 09:29:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: John Hay Cc: shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp (Yoshinobu Inoue), freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should jail treat ip-number? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 09 Nov 1999 10:24:28 +0200." <199911090824.KAA90295@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:29:11 +0100 Message-ID: <22398.942136151@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199911090824.KAA90295@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za>, John Hay writes: >If we want >people to even think of moving to IPv6 we will have to make as much >of FreeBSD's functionality work on there as possible. I personally do not see IPv6 as being desirable at this time. It suffers from second systems syndrome and doesn't provide any benefit for the end-user so there is no incentive for users to upgrade. >> So far IPv6 has gotten no futher than OSI ever did. > >I think I was lucky to have mostly been screened from OSI, so I can't >really compare them. IPv6 seem quitealive to me though. Ohh, OSI was quite a live for a long time as well, until the government funded life-support was cut, then it evaporated overnight. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message