From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  7 14:53:42 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4786B16A4B3
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2003 14:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rs6000.univie.ac.at (male.univie.ac.at [131.130.1.14])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A05243FBF
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2003 14:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from l.ertl@univie.ac.at)
Received: from wireless (adslle.cc.univie.ac.at [131.130.102.11])
	by rs6000.univie.ac.at (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h97LrVD5047426;
	Tue, 7 Oct 2003 23:53:35 +0200
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 23:53:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at>
To: Martin Kotulla <martin-k@softmaker.de>
In-Reply-To: <20031007230721.D585@korben.in.tern>
Message-ID: <20031007235146.E585@korben.in.tern>
References: <002601c38c25$e652cad0$6c01a8c0@MITERDOMAIN>
	<3F831EA6.9040406@softmaker.de> <20031007230721.D585@korben.in.tern>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: 'Advocacy' <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
cc: info@softmaker.de
Subject: Re: TextMaker: Should we support FreeBSD at all?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:53:42 -0000

On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:

> On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Martin Kotulla wrote:
>
> > That's what irritates me. TextMaker on the vast majority of systems is
> > MUCH faster than OpenOffice, even faster than Abiword. It should load in
>
> This would really be a reason to use TextMaker instead of OO.  OO is
> great, because it's more or less the only available office package for
> *nix, but more alternatives (and faster ones) are always good.

Just for the record, I downloaded your Linux trial version and I have to
say, it really starts up in one, two seconds.  Even the fonts are
anti-aliased - very nice :-)

regards,
le

-- 
Lukas Ertl                             eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at
UNIX Systemadministrator               Tel.:  (+43 1) 4277-14073
Vienna University Computer Center      Fax.:  (+43 1) 4277-9140
University of Vienna                   http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/