From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 10 22:40:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAA016A420 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:40:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcash@ocis.net) Received: from smtp.sd73.bc.ca (smtp.sd73.bc.ca [142.24.13.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A51E43D46 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:40:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcash@ocis.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46508A004A for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:43:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.sd73.bc.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.sd73.bc.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06383-02-50 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:43:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from s10.sbo (s10.sbo [192.168.0.10]) by smtp.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602E68A0043 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:43:05 -0800 (PST) From: Freddie Cash To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:40:49 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1139607813.23382.20.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> In-Reply-To: <1139607813.23382.20.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602101440.50440.fcash@ocis.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at sd73.bc.ca Subject: Re: Portsnap support on CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:40:59 -0000 On Friday 10 February 2006 01:43 pm, Paul Mather wrote: > I've noticed lately a lot of "succeeds port" messages when I run > portversion (from the portupgrade port) to list which of my packages > are out of date and require updating. These messages are incorrect > (i.e., the "port has" version identified by portversion is older than > that in the actual port Makefile), and I don't get incorrect > identifications from either pkg_version or portmanager. (I also don't > get this problem on a RELENG_6 system I have, either.) > After a little looking, I discovered that my /usr/ports/INDEX-7 file is > not being updated. Investigation of the portsnap source reveals that > it only actually generates INDEX, INDEX-5, and INDEX-6 from portsnap > updates in extract_indices(); it doesn't generate INDEX-7. Workarounds until portsnap does it again, in order of length of time to generate INDEX-7: cd /usr/ports ; make fetchindex cd usr/ports ; make index pkgdb -U -- Freddie Cash fcash@ocis.net