Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:30:51 -0700 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uname ? Message-ID: <20120202183051.GA25323@hemlock.hydra> In-Reply-To: <NBECLJEKGLBKHHFFANMBKEICCPAA.joeb1@a1poweruser.com> References: <NBECLJEKGLBKHHFFANMBKEICCPAA.joeb1@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:09:00PM +0800, joeb1 wrote: > It looks to me that the uname -m and uname -p always have the same > value, such as "i386". > > Is there some fine-grained difference or some un-documented difference > between them > or some combination were the values would be different? I don't have one handy, so I don't have any way to test this right now, but I wonder if an AMD machine might give a different answer to one of those than an Intel machine, given a 32-bit 386 instruction set processor for both. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120202183051.GA25323>