From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Apr 24 11:33:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE72B1B5C3 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60F71A13 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:33:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 63CE2C44C; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:33:20 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "kristof (Kristof Provost)" Reply-to: D1944+325+8925873bdc96dfc2@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NDc2NzM0MzY4OTdiYThiNTU1MjY2ZDZmMTJiIFccrwA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:33:21 -0000 kristof added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS sys/netpfil/pf/pf_if.c:130 I don't understand why this is required. Surely if an ifnet lives in V_ifnet (so, lives in the current vnet) ifp->if_vnet is always going to be curvnet? sys/netpfil/pf/pf_if.c:141 Why add curvnet here? pfi_attach_ifnet_event doesn't use its argument. sys/netpfil/pf/pf_if.c:143 Same as above. sys/netpfil/pf/pf_if.c:151 Same as above. sys/netpfil/pf/pf_if.c:814 I believe this is correct, but should probably include adding an __unused annotation to arg, and removing the 'curvnet' argument from the EVENTHANDLER_REGISTER() call. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1944 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: nvass-gmx.com, bz, trociny, kristof, gnn, zec, rodrigc, glebius, eri Cc: ryan_timewasted.me, mmoll, javier_ovi_yahoo.com, farrokhi, julian, robak, freebsd-virtualization-list, freebsd-pf-list, freebsd-net-list