Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 14:51:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com>, <current@FreeBSD.org>, <developers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress Message-ID: <20020901145109.K16984-100000@wonky.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <20020901215028.GA36103@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:34:12PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > So, what is it about gcc 3.2 that's so important, considering that we > > wanted to do a real 5.0 release within 2 months? > > This is really 3.1.1 -- so it is a minor point release. 3.2 fixes a bug > that changes the API so it couldn't be fixed in 3.1.1. Otherwise they > are the same compilers. > > That said, we don't want to be stuck with a stale compiler for all of > 5.x. I highly recomend we use 3.3 in our 5.0-R. > All that's good, but is this on the roadmap of RE && core so that adequate destabilization time is accounted for? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020901145109.K16984-100000>