From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 13:49:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC44116A4CE for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:49:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.thinkburst.com (juno.geocomm.com [204.214.64.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2181843D45 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:49:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbozza@thinkburst.com) Received: from mailgate.thinkburstmedia.com (gateway.thinkburstmedia.com [204.214.64.100]) by mail.thinkburst.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B60B36797; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 07:49:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from thinkburst.com (bacchus.thinkburst.com [10.1.1.25]) by mailgate.thinkburstmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075504; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 07:49:22 -0600 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 07:54:19 -0600 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 4.x can't read 5.x dump? thread-index: AcTYZfizztuqjhqlS320xIRUsmxDlwAD/t5w From: "Jaime Bozza" To: "Nick Barnes" , "Ken Smith" cc: Joel Hatton cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: 4.x can't read 5.x dump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 13:49:23 -0000 >There's no theoretical reason why the formats used by dump and >restore shouldn't be forward and backward compatible, allowing >an older restore (to an older filesystem type) to pick out the >parts of the dump which make sense to it while ignoring parts >which it doesn't understand. > >But they aren't, so it can't, so you're out of luck. This is a pretty interesting issue that I didn't realize. I've regularly restored dumps from a Solaris 8 machine to my FreeBSD 4.x machines. (We had data volumes on some old Solaris machines that I replaced with FreeBSD.) I guess FreeBSD and Solaris volumes are similar enough that the restore just worked. Jaime Bozza