From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 18:39:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BD516A4CE for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:39:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outmx001.isp.belgacom.be (outmx001.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A216643D2F for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:39:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geert@lori.mine.nu) Received: from outmx001.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id i7VIdBMR025215 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:39:11 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from lori.mine.nu (150-158.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.158.150]) with ESMTP id i7VId9Ia025195; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:39:09 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: by lori.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 64D5FAEC; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:39:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:39:08 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx To: oceanare@pacific.net.sg Message-ID: <20040831183908.GA87694@lori.mine.nu> References: <20040831133551.GA86660@lori.mine.nu> <4134B312.8030309@pacific.net.sg> <1093958674.680.2.camel@book> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1093958674.680.2.camel@book> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-GPG-Key: http://lori.mine.nu/gnupgkey.asc X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/766C1E92 X-Accept-Language: nl,en cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spreading partitions over multiple drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:39:15 -0000 > Not for this usage. > > > > Fragmentation may be LESS of a problem with UFS, but a moving target > > like one big /usr (incl src, obj, ports) will get fragmented as well. > > This is how you see it. I have not heard that there is any tool to help > here. > > I would not call this fragmentation. It is more like spreading the files > from one directory all over the disk. Ok but the effect is the same: constant movement of the head. > > Splitting up partitions would reduce this fragmentation (as you are > > essentially defining some "super large blocks"), and may increase > > filesystem stability in case of crashes etc. > > > It might not affect stability but it increases the chances to fix a > problem in case of a crash. Yes I meant stability of the filesystem not of the running OS. Ok but the original question was about spreading partitions amongst multiple disks, not pro/con splitting partitions on one disk. :-) GH