From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 18 16:58:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8ADB16A417 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:58:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from mx3.netclusive.de (mx3.netclusive.de [89.110.132.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E16C13C44B for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:58:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (p3EE21983.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [62.226.25.131]) by mx3.netclusive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46DF60413B for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:58:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id E2D0E15213; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:58:49 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.devel.sparc Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:58:49 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <755cb9fc0610230745h3e3aa0d8y920d07e90d43eee6@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: garfield.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1169139529 37504 192.168.100.11 (18 Jan 2007 16:58:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:58:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: SunFire V210/V240 (UltraSparc IIIi) and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:58:52 -0000 On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:45:07 +0100 Alexandre Vieira wrote: > Reading trough 6.1 hardware notes for the sparc64 port I can see that any > Ultrasparc III system is not supported. I have a bunch of these laying > around If they are just lying around, would you care to part with one of them? I could use one of those right about now. :-) Regards, Chris