Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:22:02 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 208543] [Patch][Update] net/samba42 update to 4.2.9
Message-ID:  <bug-208543-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208543

            Bug ID: 208543
           Summary: [Patch][Update] net/samba42 update to 4.2.9
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Keywords: patch
          Severity: Affects Many People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: timur@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de
          Assignee: timur@FreeBSD.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(timur@FreeBSD.org)
          Keywords: patch

Created attachment 168997
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D168997&action=
=3Dedit
Update net/samba42 from 4.2.7 to 4.2.9

Update Samba 4.2.7 to 4.2.9:

Removed bin/async_connect_send_test from pkg-plist, see
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2015-December/110967.html

Renamed %%PYTHON_SITELIBDIR%%/samba/tests/getopt.py, now get_opt.py

Removed EXTRA_PATCHES=3D         ${PATCHDIR}/extra-patch-security:-p1 from
Makefile, BUG 11394 (dup of 11375) was commited upstream, see
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D11394#c15
and the corresponding commit:
https://git.samba.org/?p=3Dsamba.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3Db8077d861f4fd04f1d5=
c4187b8bf0166e2d8ae29

Attention: I haven't verified if this upstream-commit exactly corresponds to
each hunk in each diff of "extra-patch-security". 3 diffs did reverse-apply
cleanly, but 2 diffs were more complicated. As far as I can tell, the upstr=
eam
commit replaces all diffs, but please double check to be sure.

NOTE: Haven't done samba43 update because I have the problem that smbd cons=
umes
~90% of one CPU core when idle (on 10.3). Unfortunately I haven't time to
investigate further, so I went back to samba42.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-208543-13>