From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov  4 15:49:34 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA25305
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 15:49:34 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA25292
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 15:49:30 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA15494; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 15:48:46 -0800
To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth)
cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>,
        wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman), hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Hmmmm! `resvport' keyword not documented *anywhere*? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 04 Nov 1995 16:14:47 CST."
             <v0213050eacc1949ec164@[199.183.109.242]> 
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 1995 15:48:46 -0800
Message-ID: <15491.815528926@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> On this subject, I adopt the government policy.
> "If it's in there, it has to be listed on the label"
> 
> An undocumented "feature" is a coding error.

I'm in hearty agreement.

					Jordan