From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 17:47:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807D5D8E; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@skew.org) Received: from chilled.skew.org (chilled.skew.org [70.90.116.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4378E1C91; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chilled.skew.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chilled.skew.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6BHbLVU008579; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:37:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mike@chilled.skew.org) Received: (from mike@localhost) by chilled.skew.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r6BHbLdX008578; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:37:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mike) From: Mike Brown Message-Id: <201307111737.r6BHbLdX008578@chilled.skew.org> Subject: Does the SpamAssassin port really need to delete sa-update keys? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:37:21 -0600 (MDT) X-Whoa: whoa. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL125 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: beech@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:47:44 -0000 Since 2007, the mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/pkg-plist contains this: @unexec rm -rf %D/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-update-keys Why does it remove the sa-update-keys directory? There's no reason given in the commit message. As a result of deleting the keyring, every time some upgrades SpamAssassin, if they're using GPG with sa-update, they have to remember to re-fetch the channel keys from wherever and "sa-update --import" them. Why not just leave the keyring in place? Is there a security risk?