From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 22 17:35:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8417516A415 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@mail.ru) Received: from mx7.mail.ru (mx7.mail.ru [194.67.23.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA3043D60 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:35:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amdmi3@mail.ru) Received: from [213.148.29.33] (port=28482 helo=nexii.panopticon) by mx7.mail.ru with esmtp id 1GQow6-000GoR-00; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:35:38 +0400 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.2]) by nexii.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B5C1705C; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:35:16 +0400 (MSD) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AD710458B; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:35:51 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:35:51 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Marcus von Appen Message-ID: <20060922173551.GC29459@hades.panopticon> Mail-Followup-To: Marcus von Appen , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20060922065930.GA12712@medusa.sysfault.org> <20060922144741.GB29459@hades.panopticon> <20060922165737.GA832@medusa.sysfault.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060922165737.GA832@medusa.sysfault.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: devel/guichan update and dependant ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:35:55 -0000 * Marcus von Appen (mva@sysfault.org) wrote: > > > Personally I would break games/diameter and keep it as broken until a > > > compatible version of it will be released (or remove it in a year or so > > > if nothing happens). > > I agree. To fork guichan for only one port is not a solution. I > > would be grateful if you wait a week or so before updating guichan. > Of course. If you need the updated guichan port for testing, tell me and > I'll send you a diff with the changes I made. Yep, that would be useful. Thanks. -- Best regards, Dmitry mailto:amdmi3@mail.ru